2026 Gymnastics Worlds All-Around Stats: MAG by the Numbers
Hashimoto Daiki (JPN) won the MAG All-Around title on 22 October 2026 with 85.998, ahead of Yang Haonan (84.199) and Joe Fraser (83.531). This review looks at the 24 finalists, how the final unfolded, and how each gymnast compared with his own performance at qualification on 17 October.
2026 Gymnastics Worlds All-Around Stats
1. The Final at a Glance
Highest Scores per Apparatus
| App. | Highest D | Highest E | Highest score |
| FX | Jarman 6.1 | Dukhno 8.766 | Dukhno 14.666 |
| PH | Kovtun 5.9 | Yang 8.900 | Hashimoto 14.500 |
| SR | Yang 5.4 | Oka 8.900 | Yang 14.100 |
| VT | Jarman 5.6 | Dukhno 9.466 | Jarman 14.900 |
| PB | Barajas 6.2 | Hashimoto 9.000 | Hashimoto, Kovtun 14.700 |
| HB | Barajas 6.3 | Jarman 8.8 | Hashimoto 14.766 |
Hashimoto Daiki posted the highest score on three apparatus (pommel horse, parallel bars, high bar) and shared it on a fourth. Jarman and Barajas brought the greatest difficulty, with two apparatus each, while Arsenii Dukhno had the cleanest floor and vault of the day. Jarman’s 14.900 on vault was the highest single score of the final.
Highest Totals Across the Six Apparatus
| Rank | Total D | Total E |
| 1 | Kovtun 33.6 | Hashimoto 52.698 |
| 2 | Barajas 33.3 | Yang 52.499 |
| 3 | Hashimoto 33.0 | Jarman 51.965 |
Difficulty alone did not decide the title. Illia Kovtun had the highest difficulty of the final but finished 11th, after falls on FX and PH. Hashimoto Daiki is the only gymnast in the top 3 for both difficulty and execution, and the two medallists had the best execution of the field.
Average Scores per Apparatus: Final vs. Qualification
| App. | Avg D | Avg E | Avg Total AA | Avg Total QX | Scores up | Scores down |
| FX | 5.213 | 7.950 | 13.158 | 13.397 | 11 | 12 |
| PH | 5.075 | 7.854 | 12.929 | 13.358 | 9 | 15 |
| SR | 4.654 | 8.283 | 12.958 | 13.052 | 6 | 15 |
| VT | 4.817 | 9.027 | 13.794 | 13.848 | 14 | 8 |
| PB | 5.371 | 8.376 | 13.776 | 14.040 | 7 | 17 |
| HB | 5.358 | 7.814 | 13.164 | 13.544 | 9 | 14 |
The averages compare the same 24 gymnasts in both rounds. Scores were lower in the final on every apparatus, mostly because of execution, as difficulty stayed almost the same. Vault was the only apparatus where more gymnasts improved than dropped. Pommel horse and high bar saw the biggest falls in average score.
2. How the Final Unfolded
Top 3 After Each Rotation
| After | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
| R1 | Dukhno 14.666 (FX) | Fraser 14.033 (PH) | Oka 13.966 (FX) |
| R2 | Dukhno 28.766 (FX, PH) | Hashimoto 28.166 (FX, PH) | Yang 28.000 (PH, SR) |
| R3 | Yang 42.400 (PH, SR, VT) | Marinov 42.232 (SR, VT, PB) | Hashimoto 42.066 (FX, PH, SR) |
| R4 | Yang 56.966 (PH to PB) | Hashimoto 56.532 (FX to VT) | Dukhno 56.465 (FX to VT) |
| R5 | Hashimoto 71.232 (all but HB) | Dukhno 71.131 (all but HB) | Yang 70.499 (all but FX) |
| R6 | Hashimoto 85.998 | Yang 84.199 | Fraser 83.531 |
Three gymnasts took turns at the top. Arsenii Dukhno led after the first two rotations, then Yang after rotations 3 and 4. Like Japan in the Team Final, Hashimoto Daiki only took the lead after rotation 5. Arsenii was just 0.101 behind him going into high bar, but 11.566 on his last apparatus dropped him to 7th. Fraser was outside the top 3 until the very end, when floor lifted him onto the podium.
Each gymnast follows the Olympic order (FX, PH, SR, VT, PB, HB) from his starting apparatus, so at any point during the final, gymnasts have not yet competed on the same apparatus. The standings show how the competition unfolded, but not which gymnast was stronger at that moment.
3. Qualification vs. Final: The Gymnasts
All 24 Finalists
| Final Rk | Gymnast | QX Rk | QX Total | Final Total | Change |
| 1 | Hashimoto (JPN) | 2 | 84.632 | 85.998 | +1.366 |
| 2 | Yang (CHN) | 6 | 83.464 | 84.199 | +0.735 |
| 3 | Fraser (GBR) | 8 | 83.065 | 83.531 | +0.466 |
| 4 | Marinov (RUS) | 12 | 81.564 | 83.297 | +1.733 |
| 5 | Barajas (COL) | 9 | 82.831 | 83.232 | +0.401 |
| 6 | Jarman (GBR) | 5 | 83.698 | 82.865 | -0.833 |
| 7 | Dukhno (RUS) | 3 | 83.866 | 82.697 | -1.169 |
| 8 | Oka (JPN) | 1 | 85.098 | 82.165 | -2.933 |
| 9 | Richard (USA) | 11 | 82.098 | 82.165 | +0.067 |
| 10 | Seifert (SUI) | 15 | 80.598 | 81.198 | +0.600 |
| 11 | Kovtun (CRO) | 7 | 83.099 | 80.264 | -2.835 |
| 12 | Leykin (USA) | 24 | 78.998 | 79.665 | +0.667 |
| 13 | Abbadini (ITA) | 13 | 81.065 | 79.632 | -1.433 |
| 14 | Eder (GER) | 26 | 78.465 | 79.632 | +1.167 |
| 15 | Sakouhi (FRA) | 23 | 78.999 | 79.498 | +0.499 |
| 16 | Langenegger (SUI) | 14 | 80.599 | 77.798 | -2.801 |
| 17 | Mansard (FRA) | 21 | 79.199 | 77.533 | -1.666 |
| 18 | Martinez (BEL) | 22 | 79.063 | 77.465 | -1.598 |
| 19 | Zakutney (CAN) | 25 | 78.764 | 77.432 | -1.332 |
| 20 | Faverus (NED) | 18 | 79.466 | 76.264 | -3.202 |
| 21 | Meszaros (HUN) | 16 | 80.264 | 75.165 | -5.099 |
| 22 | Gruenberg (NED) | 27 | 78.432 | 74.697 | -3.735 |
| 23 | Idrissov (KAZ) | 17 | 79.665 | 74.397 | -5.268 |
| 24 | Vera (COL) | 10 | 82.764 | 73.899 | -8.865 |
Ten gymnasts improved on their qualification total and fourteen dropped. Daniel Marinov made the biggest climb, from 12th in qualification to 4th. Timo Eder (26th to 14th) and Danila Leykin (24th to 12th) also gained twelve places each. Oka Shinnosuke, who topped qualification, finished 8th, tied on points with Frederick Richard and ranked ahead on the tie-break.
Biggest Improvements and Drops
| Total Score | Total D | Total E | |
| Biggest increase | Marinov +1.733 | Marinov +0.7 | Hashimoto +1.366 |
| 2nd | Hashimoto +1.366 | Kovtun +0.5 | Eder +1.067 |
| 3rd | Eder +1.167 | Dukhno +0.4 | Marinov +1.033 |
Execution made the difference in both directions. Hashimoto Daiki performed 0.2 less difficulty than in qualification, so his whole gain came from cleaner gymnastics. Daniel Marinov is the only gymnast in the top 3 for improvement in both difficulty and execution. At the other end, Camilo Vera’s drop came almost entirely from execution, on a difficult day on floor, pommel horse and high bar.
| Total score | Total D | Total E | |
| Biggest decrease | Vera -8.865 | Langenegger -1.3 | Vera -8.365 |
| 2nd | Idrissov -5.268 | Meszaros -1.3 | Idrissov -4.968 |
| 3rd | Meszaros -5.099 | Faverus -0.9 | Meszaros -3.899 |
4. Consistency in the Top 8
Apparatus Ranks in the Final
| Final | Gymnast | FX | PH | SR | VT | PB | HB | App. in Top 8 | Best to Worst |
| 1 | Hashimoto | 10 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 of 6 | 1st to 10th |
| 2 | Yang | 8 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 5 of 6 | 1st to 10th |
| 3 | Fraser | 14 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 4 of 6 | 3rd to 14th |
| 4 | Marinov | 12 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 of 6 | 5th to 12th |
| 5 | Barajas | 5 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 5 of 6 | 3rd to 9th |
| 6 | Jarman | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 12 | 2 of 6 | 1st to 12th |
| 7 | Dukhno | 1 | 2 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 4 of 6 | 1st to 22nd |
| 8 | Oka | 2 | 6 | 2 | 23 | 8 | 13 | 4 of 6 | 2nd to 23rd |
The top 8 shows three different ways to build an All-Around total.
The dominant All-Arounder: Hashimoto ranked in the top 3 on five apparatus. Only floor (10th) held him back.
The steady ones: Marinov and Barajas never won an apparatus, but never dropped below 12th and 9th. Marinov is the only gymnast in the top 8 without a single top-3 apparatus finish, yet he placed 4th overall.
The all-or-nothing ones: Dukhno and Oka had brilliant apparatus finishes, with 1st and 2nd places, but one result outside the top 20 cost each of them a medal, on high bar for Dukhno and on vault for Oka.
5. Stuck Landings
24 stuck landings in the final, against 26 in qualification for the same 24 gymnasts. Eligible apparatus are FX, SR, VT, PB and HB.
Gymnasts With the Most Stuck Landings
| Gymnast | Final | App. | QX |
| Yang (CHN) | 4 | FX, SR, PB, HB | 2 |
| Hashimoto (JPN) | 3 | SR, PB, HB | 3 |
| Fraser (GBR) | 2 | SR, PB | 0 |
| Dukhno (RUS) | 2 | VT, PB | 4 |
| Abbadini (ITA) | 2 | FX, HB | 0 |
| Langenegger (SUI) | 2 | FX, PB | 0 |
| Martinez (BEL) | 2 | VT, PB | 0 |
Yang Haonan was the stuck-landing leader of the final, doubling his tally from qualification. Hashimoto Daiki stuck three in both rounds, including parallel bars and high bar each time. Between them, the two medallists stuck 7 of the 24 landings of the final. Joe Fraser, Yumin Abbadini, Florian Langenegger and Victor Martinez each went from zero stuck landings in qualification to two in the final.
Stuck Landings per Apparatus
| App. | Final | QX |
| FX | 6 | 4 |
| SR | 5 | 6 |
| VT | 2 | 1 |
| PB | 7 | 9 |
| HB | 4 | 6 |
| TOTAL | 24 | 26 |
Parallel bars produced the most stuck landings in both rounds. Floor and vault were the two apparatuses where gymnasts stuck more landings in the final than in qualification, with floor rising from four to six.
6. Penalties
Penalties per Apparatus
| App. | Final | Points lost in final | QX | Points lost in QX |
| FX | 5 | 0.7 | 7 | 1.5 |
| SR | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.3 |
| VT | 8 | 1.4 | 4 | 0.4 |
| HB | 2 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 15 | 2.7 | 12 | 2.2 |
Vault caused the most trouble in the final, with one gymnast in three penalized there, twice as many as in qualification. Floor went the other way: penalties dropped from seven to five, and the points lost were halved. Pommel horse and parallel bars were unsurprisingly penalty-free in both rounds. Eleven gymnasts finished the final without a penalty, including the two medallists, Hashimoto Daiki and Yang Haonan.
Most Costly Penalties in the AA Final
| Gymnast | Points lost | App. | QX |
| Oka (JPN) | 0.6 | VT/HB :0.3 | 0.1 |
| Abbadini (ITA) | 0.3 | HB | 0.0 |
| Faverus (NED) | 0.3 | VT | 0.1 |
| Meszaros (HUN) | 0.3 | FX | 0.4 |
| Gruenberg (NED) | 0.3 | VT | 0.4 |
Oka Shinnosuke had the costliest day, losing 0.6 on vault and high bar, against only 0.1 in qualification. Those penalties alone did not cost him a medal, but they added to a difficult vault, where he ranked 23rd.
Leave a Reply